Core i7-8700K vs Core i5-12400F
Core i7-8700K
Core i5-12400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8700K
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F
Why is Core i5-12400F better than Core i7-8700K?
The Core i7-8700K was once the undisputed king of gaming, but the modern Core i5-12400F shows just how far Intel’s architecture has advanced. The i5-12400F consistently outperforms the older i7 by 15-20% in gaming benchmarks, delivering higher frame rates and much better 1% lows. This is thanks to the massive IPC (instructions per clock) gains of the Alder Lake architecture.
Technically, the i5-12400F also brings support for PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory, making it a much more modern foundation for a 2024 or 2025 build. While the i7-8700K can still handle 1080p gaming reasonably well, its platform is effectively at a dead end. For anyone building a new budget-to-midrange PC, the i5-12400F is the definitive winner. If you are still running an 8700K, the move to a 12th-Gen or newer i5 is a highly recommended and transformative upgrade.
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) | ✅ More affordable ($110) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+109%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($160) | ✅ More affordable ($110) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8700K and Core i5-12400F
Core i7-8700K
The Core i7-8700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,572 points. Launch price was $359.
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-8700K and Core i5-12400F share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8700K versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-8700K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-8700K uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8700K scores 13,572 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 36% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 12288 kB on the Core i7-8700K vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+7% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+48% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12288 kB | 18 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 13,572 | 19,532+44% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-8700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8700K versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-8700K) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-8700K) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-8700K) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Core i7-8700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-8700K launched at $359 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. At current prices ($160 vs $110), the Core i5-12400F is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8700K delivers 84.8 pts/$ vs 177.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 70.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-8700K | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359 | $174-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $160 | $110-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.8 | 177.6+109% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-8700K and Core i5-12400F
