Core i7-8709G vs Xeon X7350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8709G vs Xeon X7350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8709G vs Xeon X7350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8709G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7350, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $338 MSRP, while Xeon X7350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7350

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8709G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,836 vs 7,934).
❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8709G better than Xeon X7350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X7350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8709G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8709G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8709G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8709G is the better buy right now. Core i7-8709G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $338 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8709G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-8709G vs Xeon X7350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8709G

The Core i7-8709G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,934 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X7350

The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8709G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon X7350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8709G versus 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 — a 126% clock advantage for the Core i7-8709G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i7-8709G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X7350 uses Tigerton (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8709G scores 7,934 against the Xeon X7350's 7,836 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-8709G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8709G vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350.

Feature	Core i7-8709G	Xeon X7350
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+341%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+6%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	Tigerton (2007)
PassMark	7,934+1%	7,836

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8709G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7350 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-8709G	Xeon X7350
Socket	FCBGA2270	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-8709G) / VT-x (Xeon X7350). Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.