Core i7-875K
VS
A10-6800K

Core i7-875K vs A10-6800K

Intel

Core i7-875K

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A10-6800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-875K is positioned at rank 1012 and the A10-6800K is on rank 401, so the A10-6800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-875K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34635%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32727%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23762%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7159%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5670%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4960%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2841%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2804%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2553%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2553%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2524%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2456%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2422%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2412%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2390%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
100%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
100%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
99%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
99%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
97%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
96%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
96%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
96%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
95%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
94%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
93%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
93%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5870%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4027%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1213%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
961%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
841%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
482%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
475%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
433%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
433%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
428%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
410%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
409%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
405%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
99%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
99%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
98%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
98%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
98%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
98%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
97%
#401
A10-6800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
100%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A10-6800K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-875K in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-875KA10-6800K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-875KA10-6800K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-875K and A10-6800K

Intel

Core i7-875K

The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.

AMD

A10-6800K

The A10-6800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,186 points. Launch price was $142.

Processing Power

The Core i7-875K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-6800K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K versus 4.4 GHz on the A10-6800K — a 20% clock advantage for the A10-6800K (base: 2.93 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i7-875K uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-6800K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-875K scores 3,177 against the A10-6800K's 3,186 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-6800K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-875K vs 0 kB on the A10-6800K.

FeatureCore i7-875KA10-6800K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.93 GHz
4.1 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
3,177
3,186
Geekbench 6 Single
477
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-875K uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-6800K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The A10-6800K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-875KA10-6800K
Socket
LGA1156
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-875K) vs AMD-V (A10-6800K). The A10-6800K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Core i7-875K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-875K targets Desktop, A10-6800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6800K rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureCore i7-875KA10-6800K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8670D
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Budget