Core i7-875K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G

Core i7-875K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Performance Spectrum

Core i7-875K

4 / 8

3,177

+1.1%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 / 4

3,142

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-875K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-875K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-875K

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($353 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌1087.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 8W.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Delivers 132.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Draws 8W instead of 95W, a 87W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-875K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,142 vs 3,177).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-875K better than Ryzen Embedded R1305G?

Yes. Core i7-875K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-875K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-875K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-875K is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-875K comes in 135.3% more expensive on MSRP at $353 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded R1305G only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 10.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R1305G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-875K vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-875K

The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-875K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-875K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K versus 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-875K (base: 2.93 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-875K uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-875K scores 3,177 against the Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 3,142 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-875K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-875K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

Feature	Core i7-875K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+29%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.93 GHz+95%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	3,177+1%	3,142

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-875K uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-875K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Socket	LGA1156	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-875K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1305G). Primary use case: Core i7-875K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-875K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-875K was priced at $353, while the Ryzen Embedded R1305G came in at $150. On launch pricing ($353 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded R1305G was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-875K delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G — making the Ryzen Embedded R1305G the 79.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-875K	Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP	$353	$150-58%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	20.9+132%
Release Date	2010	2020

Search Core i7-875K on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R1305G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.