Core i7-940 vs Athlon X4 830
Core i7-940
Athlon X4 830
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-940 is positioned at rank 1071 and the Athlon X4 830 is on rank 476, so the Athlon X4 830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-940
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 830
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($90) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+259%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($90) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-940 and Athlon X4 830
Core i7-940
The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.
Athlon X4 830
The Athlon X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,018 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-940 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon X4 830's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon X4 830 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 830 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-940 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X4 830 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940 scores 3,029 against the Athlon X4 830's 3,018 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-940.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,029 | 3,018 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-940 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 830 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Athlon X4 830 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Core i7-940) vs 2 (Athlon X4 830). PCIe lanes: 36 (Core i7-940) vs 16 (Athlon X4 830) — the Core i7-940 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB | 64 GB+167% |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 36+125% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-940) / not specified (Athlon X4 830). Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-940 launched at $562 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 830 debuted at $70. At current prices ($90 vs $25), the Athlon X4 830 is $65 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-940 delivers 33.7 pts/$ vs 120.7 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 830 — making the Athlon X4 830 the 112.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $562 | $70-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90 | $25-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7 | 120.7+258% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-940 and Athlon X4 830
