Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2600

Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-9700F

8 / 8

13,165

+0.2%

13,145

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700F

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.

Ryzen 5 2600

2018

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.1 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,165).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700F better than Ryzen 5 2600?

Yes. Core i7-9700F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 2600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-9700F comes in 62.3% more expensive on MSRP at $323 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2600 is also 62.1% better value on MSRP (66.1 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 2600 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 5 2600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700F

The Core i7-9700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $323.

Ryzen 5 2600

The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700F packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-9700F versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700F (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700F uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700F scores 13,165 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-9700F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Ryzen 5 2600
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+21%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+8433%	3 MB
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
PassMark	13,165	13,145
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	6,344
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,893

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700F uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Ryzen 5 2600
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-9700F) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Ryzen 5 2600
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes
Target Use	—	General Productivity

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700F was priced at $323, while the Ryzen 5 2600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($323 vs $199), Ryzen 5 2600 was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700F delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 66.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2600 — making the Ryzen 5 2600 the 47.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP	$323	$199-38%
Performance per Dollar	40.8	66.1+62%
Release Date	2019	2018

Search Core i7-9700F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 2600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.