Core i7-9700F vs Xeon E-2146G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700F vs Xeon E-2146G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700F vs Xeon E-2146G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700F

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,240).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2146G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Xeon E-2146G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2146G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E-2146G.

Xeon E-2146G

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P630, while Core i7-9700F needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9700F.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700F better than Xeon E-2146G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2146G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2146G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700F is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $323 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E-2146G is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-9700F vs Xeon E-2146G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700F

The Core i7-9700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $323.

Xeon E-2146G

The Xeon E-2146G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,240 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700F packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2146G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-9700F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2146G — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700F (base: 3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700F uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2146G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700F scores 13,165 against the Xeon E-2146G's 13,240 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2146G. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Xeon E-2146G
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+4%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	13,165	13,240
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,557
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	6,385

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i7-9700F	Xeon E-2146G
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-9700F) / Yes (Xeon E-2146G). The Xeon E-2146G includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P630), while the Core i7-9700F requires a dedicated GPU.