
Core i7-975

Core i7-2630QM
Core i7-975 vs Core i7-2630QM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-975 vs Core i7-2630QM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077
Core i7-975 vs Core i7-2630QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-975
2009Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (3,527 vs 3,550).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- β188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2630QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-2630QM
2011Why buy it
- β +0.7% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $621 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Delivers 166.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 3.5 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- β Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2630QM better than Core i7-975?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-975 vs Core i7-2630QM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-975
The Core i7-975 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,527 points. Launch price was $476.

Core i7-2630QM
The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-975 and Core i7-2630QM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-975 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM β a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-975 (base: 3.33 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-975 uses the Bloomfield (2008β2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2630QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-975 scores 3,527 against the Core i7-2630QM's 3,550 β a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-2630QM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-975 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2630QM.
| Feature | Core i7-975 | Core i7-2630QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.33 GHz+67% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008β2010) | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 3,527 | 3,550 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-975 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2630QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-975 | Core i7-2630QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 32 |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-975) / true (Core i7-2630QM). The Core i7-2630QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-975 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-975 | Core i7-2630QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-975 was priced at $999, while the Core i7-2630QM came in at $378. On launch pricing ($999 vs $378), Core i7-2630QM was $621 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-975 delivers 3.5 pts/$ vs 9.4 pts/$ for the Core i7-2630QM β making the Core i7-2630QM the 90.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-975 | Core i7-2630QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $378-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.5 | 9.4+169% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















