Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 5825C

CPU

GPU

Core i9-10900T

10 Cores20 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5825C

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 5825C Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900T

10 / 20

14,727

+1.1%

14,561

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 5825C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 5825C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

✅+4.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 237.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,710 vs 1,961).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 5825C

2022

Why buy it

✅+14.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,145 vs 7,476).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825C better than Core i9-10900T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 5825C is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900T pulls ahead with 4.6% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i9-10900T also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5825C is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5825C comes in 233.3% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $120 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i9-10900T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.6% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i9-10900T is also 237.1% better value on MSRP (122.7 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5825C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10900T vs Ryzen 7 5825C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 5825C

The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900T packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5825C offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5825C is built on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900T scores 14,727 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-10900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,710 vs 1,961, a 13.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825C that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,476 vs 7,145 (4.5% advantage for the Core i9-10900T). L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 5825C
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	20 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	—	Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark	14,727+1%	14,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,551
Geekbench 6 Single	1,710	1,961+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,476+5%	7,145

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5825C — the Ryzen 7 5825C supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900T) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Core i9-10900T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z490,H470,B460,H410,Z590,B560,H510 (Core i9-10900T) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 5825C
Socket	LGA1200	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200+9%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support Yes virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900T) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 5825C
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Radeon Vega 8
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10900T was priced at $120, while the Ryzen 7 5825C came in at $400. On launch pricing ($120 vs $400), Core i9-10900T was $280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900T delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Core i9-10900T the 108.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10900T	Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP	$120-70%	$400
Performance per Dollar	122.7+237%	36.4
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Core i9-10900T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5825C on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.