
Core i9-10900TE

Ryzen 3 8300G
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 3 8300G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 3 8300G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 3 8300G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10900TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.8 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 45.8 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,159).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300G better than Core i9-10900TE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 3 8300G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900TE
The Core i9-10900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,159 points. Launch price was $488.


Ryzen 3 8300G
The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900TE packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i9-10900TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-10900TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300G (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-10900TE uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900TE scores 14,159 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-10900TE. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900TE vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.
| Feature | Core i9-10900TE | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+150% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,159 | 14,113 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900TE uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900TE | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10900TE was priced at $309, while the Ryzen 3 8300G came in at $176. On launch pricing ($309 vs $176), Ryzen 3 8300G was $133 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900TE delivers 45.8 pts/$ vs 80.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300G — making the Ryzen 3 8300G the 54.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900TE | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309 | $176-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.8 | 80.2+75% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













