Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900TE

10 / 20

14,159

0.0%

14,213

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900TE

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,159 vs 14,213).
❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U better than Core i9-10900TE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10900TE is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i9-10900TE also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-10900TE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (45.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900TE

The Core i9-10900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,159 points. Launch price was $488.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,213 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900TE packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900TE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-10900TE versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900TE (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-10900TE uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U uses Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900TE scores 14,159 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U's 14,213 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U.

Feature	Core i9-10900TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+5%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022)
PassMark	14,159	14,213

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900TE uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.