
Core i9-10980XE

Core Ultra 5 235T
Core i9-10980XE vs Core Ultra 5 235T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10980XE vs Core Ultra 5 235T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10980XE vs Core Ultra 5 235T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10980XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 129.8 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 235T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 235T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $732 less on MSRP ($247 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 294.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.8 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU, while Core i9-10980XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,900 vs 16,275).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980XE better than Core Ultra 5 235T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10980XE vs Core Ultra 5 235T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10980XE
The Core i9-10980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 32,187 points. Launch price was $979.

Core Ultra 5 235T
The Core Ultra 5 235T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,053 points. Launch price was $247.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235T offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i9-10980XE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10980XE versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235T — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-10980XE uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980XE scores 32,187 against the Core Ultra 5 235T's 32,053 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-10980XE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,242 vs 2,760, a 75.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,275 vs 12,900 (23.1% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980XE vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235T.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Core Ultra 5 235T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+29% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total)+3% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 32,187 | 32,053 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,309 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,242 | 2,760+122% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,275+26% | 12,900 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10980XE versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235T — the Core Ultra 5 235T supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10980XE supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235T). PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 235T) — the Core i9-10980XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10980XE) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235T).
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Core Ultra 5 235T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-6400+118% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+33% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-10980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-10980XE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 235T). The Core Ultra 5 235T includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU), while the Core i9-10980XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235T targets Mainstream Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Core Ultra 5 235T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mainstream Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10980XE was priced at $979, while the Core Ultra 5 235T came in at $247. On launch pricing ($979 vs $247), Core Ultra 5 235T was $732 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10980XE delivers 32.9 pts/$ vs 129.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 235T — making the Core Ultra 5 235T the 119.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Core Ultra 5 235T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $979 | $247-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.9 | 129.8+295% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














