
Core i9-10980XE

Xeon Silver 4316
Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon Silver 4316 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon Silver 4316 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon Silver 4316: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10980XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $147 less on MSRP ($979 MSRP vs $1,126 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.9 vs 28.9 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $1,126 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4316, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Silver 4316
2021Why buy it
- ✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 48.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10980XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,846 vs 24,309).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.9 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($1,126 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980XE better than Xeon Silver 4316?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10980XE vs Xeon Silver 4316 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10980XE
The Core i9-10980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 32,187 points. Launch price was $979.

Xeon Silver 4316
The Xeon Silver 4316 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 32,556 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Silver 4316 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10980XE versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4316 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980XE (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-10980XE uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4316 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980XE scores 32,187 against the Xeon Silver 4316's 32,556 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4316. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,309 vs 21,846 (10.7% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,242 vs 1,621, a 26.5% lead for the Xeon Silver 4316 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,275 vs 13,010 (22.3% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980XE vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4316.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 20 / 40+11% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+41% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+21% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 32,187 | 32,556+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,309+11% | 21,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,242 | 1,621+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,275+25% | 13,010 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4316 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10980XE versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Silver 4316 — the Core i9-10980XE supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4316 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4316). PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 64 (Xeon Silver 4316) — the Xeon Silver 4316 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10980XE) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4316).
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 6144 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-10980XE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4316). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4316 targets Budget Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4316 rivals EPYC 7313.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Budget Server / Virtualization |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10980XE was priced at $979, while the Xeon Silver 4316 came in at $1126. On launch pricing ($979 vs $1126), Core i9-10980XE was $147 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10980XE delivers 32.9 pts/$ vs 28.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4316 — making the Core i9-10980XE the 12.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Xeon Silver 4316 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $979-13% | $1126 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.9+14% | 28.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














