
Core i9-10980XE

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10980XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.9 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($979 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,309 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+36.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 48.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,206 vs 1,242).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $979 MSRP).
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10980XE better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10980XE
The Core i9-10980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 32,187 points. Launch price was $979.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10980XE versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980XE (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-10980XE uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10980XE scores 32,187 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10980XE. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,309 vs 33,213 (31% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,242 vs 1,206, a 2.9% lead for the Core i9-10980XE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,275 vs 7,612 (72.5% advantage for the Core i9-10980XE). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980XE vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 32 / 64+78% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total) | 64 MB+159% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 32,187 | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 24,309 | 33,213+37% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,242+3% | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,275+114% | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10980XE) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10980XE) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-10980XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-10980XE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10980XE was priced at $979, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX came in at $1799. On launch pricing ($979 vs $1799), Core i9-10980XE was $820 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10980XE delivers 32.9 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core i9-10980XE the 59.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10980XE | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $979-46% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.9+85% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













