Core i9-13950HX
VS
Xeon 6515P

Core i9-13950HX vs Xeon 6515P

Intel

Core i9-13950HX

24 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon 6515P

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13950HX

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
104%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
96%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
95%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6515P

#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
104%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
103%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
103%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
100%
#201
Xeon Gold 6248R
MSRP: $2700|Avg: N/A
99%
#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($886) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6515P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($199)
⚠️ Higher cost ($886)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13950HX ($199), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($687 less, 78% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+348%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($199)
⚠️ Higher cost ($886)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13950HX and Xeon 6515P

Intel

Core i9-13950HX

The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.

Intel

Xeon 6515P

The Xeon 6515P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 40,720 points. Launch price was $740.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13950HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6515P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13950HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6515P — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-13950HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6515P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13950HX scores 41,012 against the Xeon 6515P's 40,720 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13950HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13950HX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6515P.

FeatureCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.5 GHz+45%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
72 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark
41,012
40,720
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13950HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6515P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13950HX versus 6400 on the Xeon 6515P — the Xeon 6515P supports 13.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6515P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 8 (Xeon 6515P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 88 (Xeon 6515P) — the Xeon 6515P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6515P).

FeatureCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
Socket
FCBGA1964
LGA4710
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
5600
6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity
192
4096+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
88+340%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13950HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon 6515P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core; Xeon 6515P rivals EPYC 9534.

FeatureCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13950HX launched at $590 MSRP, while the Xeon 6515P debuted at $740. At current prices ($199 vs $886), the Core i9-13950HX is $687 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13950HX delivers 206.1 pts/$ vs 46.0 pts/$ for the Xeon 6515P — making the Core i9-13950HX the 127.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-13950HXXeon 6515P
MSRP
$590-20%
$740
Avg Price (30d)
$199-78%
$886
Performance per Dollar
206.1+348%
46.0
Release Date
2023
2025