Core i9-13950HX vs EPYC 7F52
Core i9-13950HX
EPYC 7F52
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13950HX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+809%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13950HX and EPYC 7F52
Core i9-13950HX
The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13950HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7F52 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13950HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 — a 34% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13950HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7F52 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13950HX scores 41,012 against the EPYC 7F52's 41,388 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7F52. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13950HX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+41% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+611% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 41,012 | 41,388 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13950HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F52 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13950HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 — the Core i9-13950HX supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7F52). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7F52) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7F52).
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13950HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7F52). The Core i9-13950HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core; EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13950HX launched at $590 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F52 debuted at $3100. At current prices ($199 vs $1826), the Core i9-13950HX is $1627 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13950HX delivers 206.1 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 7F52 — making the Core i9-13950HX the 160.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $590-81% | $3100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-89% | $1826 |
| Performance per Dollar | 206.1+808% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13950HX and EPYC 7F52
