Core i9-13950HX
EPYC 7313P
Core i9-13950HX vs EPYC 7313P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13950HX vs EPYC 7313P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13950HX vs EPYC 7313P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13950HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $323 less on MSRP ($590 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($590 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,012 vs 41,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7313P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13950HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).
- ❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-13950HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13950HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13950HX better than EPYC 7313P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13950HX vs EPYC 7313P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13950HX
The Core i9-13950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,012 points. Launch price was $590.
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13950HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7313P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13950HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13950HX versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13950HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-13950HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7313P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-13950HX scores 41,012 against the EPYC 7313P's 41,017 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 7313P. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13950HX vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+49% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 41,012 | 41,017 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13950HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7313P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13950HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7313P — the Core i9-13950HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7313P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13950HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7313P) — the EPYC 7313P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13950HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7313P).
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13950HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P). The Core i9-13950HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7313P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13950HX rivals M3 Max 16-Core; EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13950HX was priced at $590, while the EPYC 7313P came in at $913. On launch pricing ($590 vs $913), Core i9-13950HX was $323 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13950HX delivers 69.5 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313P — making the Core i9-13950HX the 43% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13950HX | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $590-35% | $913 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.5+55% | 44.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13950HX and EPYC 7313P
