Core i9-14900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Core i9-14900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-14900F

24 / 32

46,825

+108.8%

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 31.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
59.3% HIGHER MSRP
$524 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 46,825).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900F better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Yes. Core i9-14900F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 108.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900F is the stronger fit. You are getting 108.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900F is the better buy right now. Core i9-14900F comes in 59.3% more expensive on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 31.1% better value on MSRP (89.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 3700X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 24% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 70.4% lead for the Core i9-14900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+27%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+13%	32 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	46,825+109%	22,430
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,820	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core i9-14900F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14900F was priced at $524, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($524 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Core i9-14900F the 26.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$524	$329-37%
Performance per Dollar	89.4+31%	68.2
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Core i9-14900F on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.