Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7371

Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7371 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-14901E

8 / 16

30,298

+0.5%

30,156

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7371 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7371: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7371 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7371, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $557 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (6,941 vs 14,262).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14901E better than EPYC 7371?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7371 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14901E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14901E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14901E is the stronger fit. You are getting 105.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14901E is the better buy right now. Core i9-14901E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $557 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14901E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7371 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7371 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7371 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the EPYC 7371's 30,156 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,894 vs 1,216, a 81.7% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,262 vs 6,941 (69.1% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	EPYC 7371
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+47%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	30,298	30,156
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,894+138%	1,216
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,262+105%	6,941

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7371 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 — the Core i9-14901E supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14901E) vs 8 (EPYC 7371). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 128 (EPYC 7371) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7371).

Feature	Core i9-14901E	EPYC 7371
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	EPYC 7371
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V, SVM
Target Use	—	High-frequency Server Workloads