
Core i9-14901E vs Xeon W-3265

Core i9-14901E

Xeon W-3265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-14901E
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($689) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+397%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($689) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14901E and Xeon W-3265

Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3265
The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-14901E. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+22% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+9% | 33 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,298 | 30,105 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,894 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,262 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14901E) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the Xeon W-3265 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 2933+58560% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+19660700% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs true (Xeon W-3265). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3265 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14901E launched at $557 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3265 debuted at $3684. At current prices ($689 vs $3400), the Core i9-14901E is $2711 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14901E delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265 — making the Core i9-14901E the 133% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $557-85% | $3684 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $689-80% | $3400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.0+394% | 8.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















