Core M-5Y51
VS
Pentium Dual Core T3400

Core M-5Y51 vs Pentium Dual Core T3400

Intel

Core M-5Y51

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3400

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core M-5Y51 is positioned at rank #1154 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y51

#1141
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4064%
#1142
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4004%
#1143
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3676%
#1144
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3659%
#1145
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3626%
#1147
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3501%
#1148
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3357%
#1149
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3352%
#1150
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3262%
#1153
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
100%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1155
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
100%
#1156
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
99%
#1158
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1161
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
94%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core M-5Y51 (2014) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore M-5Y51Pentium Dual Core T3400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($89)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T3400 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore M-5Y51Pentium Dual Core T3400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+215%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($89)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y51 and Pentium Dual Core T3400

Intel

Core M-5Y51

The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3400

The Pentium Dual Core T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y51 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T3400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 versus 2.16 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3400 — a 18.5% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51. The Core M-5Y51 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y51 scores 2,030 against the Pentium Dual Core T3400's 2,026 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y51.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Pentium Dual Core T3400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+20%
2.16 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
2,030
2,026
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y51 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Pentium Dual Core T3400
Socket
FCBGA1234
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Core M-5Y51 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 debuted at $0. At current prices ($281 vs $89), the Pentium Dual Core T3400 is $192 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y51 delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 22.8 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T3400 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3400 the 103.6% better value option.

FeatureCore M-5Y51Pentium Dual Core T3400
MSRP
$281
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$281
$89-68%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
22.8+217%
Release Date
2014
2008