Core M-5Y51 vs Xeon E5410
Core M-5Y51
Xeon E5410
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y51 is positioned at rank 1154 and the Xeon E5410 is on rank 918, so the Xeon E5410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y51
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5410
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1306%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y51 and Xeon E5410
Core M-5Y51
The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon E5410
The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y51 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5410 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 — a 154.9% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Core M-5Y51 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y51 scores 2,030 against the Xeon E5410's 2,032 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5410. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y51 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+688% | 0.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.33 GHz+112% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 6 MB (total)+2300% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,030 | 2,032 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y51 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5410 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y51) / VT-x (Xeon E5410). Primary use case: Xeon E5410 targets Server.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y51 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Xeon E5410 debuted at $256. At current prices ($281 vs $20), the Xeon E5410 is $261 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y51 delivers 7.2 pts/$ vs 101.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5410 — making the Xeon E5410 the 173.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y51 | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $256-9% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $20-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 101.6+1311% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core M-5Y51 and Xeon E5410
