Core M-5Y51 vs Turion II P520

Core M-5Y51 vs Turion II P520 Performance Spectrum

Core M-5Y51

2 / 4

2,030

0.0%

2,047

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y51 vs Turion II P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y51 vs Turion II P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y51

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II P520 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,030 vs 2,047).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Turion II P520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P520 better than Core M-5Y51?

Yes. Turion II P520 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II P520 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II P520 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion II P520 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core M-5Y51 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y51 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core M-5Y51 vs Turion II P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y51

The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y51 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II P520's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51. The Core M-5Y51 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II P520 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y51 scores 2,030 against the Turion II P520's 2,047 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion II P520.

Feature	Core M-5Y51	Turion II P520
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-Y (2014)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,030	2,047

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y51 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II P520 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.