Core M-5Y70 vs Celeron G3900T
Core M-5Y70
Celeron G3900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y70 is positioned at rank 1171 and the Celeron G3900T is on rank 451, so the Celeron G3900T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y70
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+304%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y70 and Celeron G3900T
Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G3900T
The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y70 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G3900T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core M-5Y70 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G3900T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y70 scores 1,890 against the Celeron G3900T's 1,900 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3900T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz+136% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+100% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,890 | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 514 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 903 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y70 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G3900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y70) / VT-x (Celeron G3900T). The Celeron G3900T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core M-5Y70 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900T debuted at $42. At current prices ($281 vs $70), the Celeron G3900T is $211 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y70 delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900T — making the Celeron G3900T the 120.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Celeron G3900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $42-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $70-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 27.1+304% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core M-5Y70 and Celeron G3900T
