Core M-5Y70
VS
Core i5-2510E

Core M-5Y70 vs Core i5-2510E

Intel

Core M-5Y70

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-2510E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y70 is positioned at rank 1171 and the Core i5-2510E is on rank 1131, so the Core i5-2510E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y70

#1159
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4360%
#1160
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4296%
#1161
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3944%
#1162
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3926%
#1163
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3890%
#1165
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3756%
#1166
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3602%
#1167
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3596%
#1168
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3499%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
97%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2510E

#1119
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3582%
#1120
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3530%
#1121
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3241%
#1122
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3226%
#1123
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3196%
#1125
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3087%
#1126
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2960%
#1127
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2955%
#1128
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2875%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2510E leads in gaming performance. However, the Core M-5Y70 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-2510E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 89% cheaper ($30 vs $281) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+834%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y70 and Core i5-2510E

Intel

Core M-5Y70

The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-2510E

The Core i5-2510E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,884 points. Launch price was $266.

Processing Power

Both the Core M-5Y70 and Core i5-2510E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2510E — a 17.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-2510E (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core M-5Y70 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-2510E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y70 scores 1,890 against the Core i5-2510E's 1,884 — a 0.3% lead for the Core M-5Y70. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2510E.

FeatureCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+127%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,890
1,884
Geekbench 6 Single
527
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y70 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2510E uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
Socket
FCBGA1234
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y70) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2510E). The Core i5-2510E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2510E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-2510E rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core M-5Y70 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core i5-2510E debuted at $230. At current prices ($281 vs $30), the Core i5-2510E is $251 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y70 delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 62.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-2510E — making the Core i5-2510E the 161.3% better value option.

FeatureCore M-5Y70Core i5-2510E
MSRP
$281
$230-18%
Avg Price (30d)
$281
$30-89%
Performance per Dollar
6.7
62.8+837%
Release Date
2014
2011