
Core M-5Y70

Pentium G3220
Core M-5Y70 vs Pentium G3220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core M-5Y70 vs Pentium G3220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core M-5Y70 vs Pentium G3220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core M-5Y70
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 34.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $54 MSRP).
- ❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G3220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G3220
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $227 less on MSRP ($54 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 419.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($54 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Core M-5Y70 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 1,890).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3220 better than Core M-5Y70?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core M-5Y70 vs Pentium G3220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y70
The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G3220
The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.
Processing Power
The Core M-5Y70 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G3220's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3220 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core M-5Y70 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G3220 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y70 scores 1,890 against the Pentium G3220's 1,885 — a 0.3% lead for the Core M-5Y70. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz+173% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,890 | 1,885 |
Memory & Platform
The Core M-5Y70 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3220 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y70) / VT-x (Pentium G3220). The Pentium G3220 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3220 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core M-5Y70 was priced at $281, while the Pentium G3220 came in at $54. On launch pricing ($281 vs $54), Pentium G3220 was $227 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y70 delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G3220 — making the Pentium G3220 the 135.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core M-5Y70 | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $54-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 34.9+421% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














