Core M-5Y70 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Core M-5Y70 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Performance Spectrum

Core M-5Y70

2 / 4

1,890

+0.2%

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2 / 2

1,886

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y70 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y70 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y70

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,886 vs 1,890).

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y70 better than Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y70 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y70 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core M-5Y70 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core M-5Y70

The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y70 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y70. The Core M-5Y70 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y70 scores 1,890 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84's 1,886 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y70. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84.

Feature	Core M-5Y70	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-Y (2014)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,890	1,886

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y70 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.