
Core m3-7Y30

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core m3-7Y30
2016Why buy it
- β Costs $48 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Draws 5W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,418 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +363.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Delivers 692.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β 140% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β17.1% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$281 MSRP
- β1344.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 4.5W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core m3-7Y30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core m3-7Y30?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m3-7Y30 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y30
The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 51.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 161.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+69% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+260% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 2,418 | 22,430+828% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 645 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 768 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,481 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 24+140% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core m3-7Y30 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 615 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | β |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core m3-7Y30 was priced at $281, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($281 vs $329), Core m3-7Y30 was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y30 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 155.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y30 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281-15% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 68.2+693% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














