Core m3-7Y32
VS
Celeron J4115

Core m3-7Y32 vs Celeron J4115

Intel

Core m3-7Y32

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Celeron J4115

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core m3-7Y32 is positioned at rank #1090 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y32

#1078
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3056%
#1079
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3011%
#1080
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2765%
#1081
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2752%
#1082
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2727%
#1084
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2633%
#1085
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2525%
#1086
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2521%
#1087
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2453%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
96%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core m3-7Y32 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J4115 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m3-7Y32Celeron J4115
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Gemini Lake (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore m3-7Y32Celeron J4115
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron J4115

Intel

Core m3-7Y32

The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron J4115

The Celeron J4115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,688 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J4115 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4115 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4115 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y32 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron J4115 uses Gemini Lake (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the Celeron J4115's 2,688 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore m3-7Y32Celeron J4115
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.8 GHz+64%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
4 MB+700%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Gemini Lake (2019)
PassMark
2,697
2,688
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4115 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m3-7Y32Celeron J4115
Socket
FCBGA1515
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2400
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-7Y32) / true (Celeron J4115). The Celeron J4115 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4115 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.

FeatureCore m3-7Y32Celeron J4115
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true