Core m3-7Y32 vs Celeron G5900
Core m3-7Y32
Celeron G5900
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core m3-7Y32 is positioned at rank #1090 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-7Y32
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5900
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+565%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron G5900
Core m3-7Y32
The Core m3-7Y32 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,697 points. Launch price was $281.
Celeron G5900
The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core m3-7Y32 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G5900's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core m3-7Y32 versus 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G5900 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core m3-7Y32 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G5900 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y32 scores 2,697 against the Celeron G5900's 2,682 — a 0.6% lead for the Core m3-7Y32. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y32 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+209% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,697 | 2,682 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 850 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-7Y32 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G5900 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-7Y32) / VT-x (Celeron G5900). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m3-7Y32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core m3-7Y32 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Celeron G5900 debuted at $50. At current prices ($281 vs $42), the Celeron G5900 is $239 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y32 delivers 9.6 pts/$ vs 63.9 pts/$ for the Celeron G5900 — making the Celeron G5900 the 147.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core m3-7Y32 | Celeron G5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $50-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $42-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 63.9+566% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron G5900
