Core m5-6Y54 vs A10-6700T
Core m5-6Y54
A10-6700T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y54 is positioned at rank 1132 and the A10-6700T is on rank 514, so the A10-6700T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54
Performance Per Dollar A10-6700T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m5-6Y54 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m5-6Y54 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y54 and A10-6700T
Core m5-6Y54
The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.
A10-6700T
The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-6700T offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T — a 25.8% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-6700T uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the A10-6700T's 2,299 — a 0.2% lead for the A10-6700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 875 vs 289, a 100.7% lead for the Core m5-6Y54 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54 vs 0 kB on the A10-6700T.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+127% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,294 | 2,299 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 875+203% | 289 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,648 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-6700T uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The A10-6700T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m5-6Y54) vs 16 (A10-6700T) — the A10-6700T offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54) and A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T).
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 16+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) vs AMD-V (A10-6700T). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 515 (Core m5-6Y54) and Radeon HD 8650D (A10-6700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast, A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y; A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | A10-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 515 | Radeon HD 8650D |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m5-6Y54 and A10-6700T
