
Core m5-6Y54

Pentium J4205
Core m5-6Y54 vs Pentium J4205 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core m5-6Y54 vs Pentium J4205 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core m5-6Y54 vs Pentium J4205: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core m5-6Y54
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 5W instead of 10W, a 6W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 515, while Pentium J4205 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium J4205 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,294 vs 2,315).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
Pentium J4205
2016Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $120 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- β Delivers 76.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β122.2% higher power demand at 10W vs 4.5W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core m5-6Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium J4205 better than Core m5-6Y54?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core m5-6Y54 vs Pentium J4205 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m5-6Y54
The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium J4205
The Pentium J4205 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016β2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,315 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium J4205 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Pentium J4205 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 2.6 GHz on the Pentium J4205 β a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium J4205 uses Goldmont (2016β2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the Pentium J4205's 2,315 β a 0.9% lead for the Pentium J4205. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54 vs 0 kB on the Pentium J4205.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Pentium J4205 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Goldmont (2016β2017) |
| PassMark | 2,294 | 2,315 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 875 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,648 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium J4205 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Pentium J4205 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1296 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) / not specified (Pentium J4205). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Pentium J4205 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Pentium J4205 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 515 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core m5-6Y54 was priced at $281, while the Pentium J4205 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($281 vs $161), Pentium J4205 was $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y54 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Pentium J4205 β making the Pentium J4205 the 55.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Pentium J4205 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $161-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 14.4+76% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














