Core m5-6Y54
VS
Core 2 Duo P7450

Core m5-6Y54 vs Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel

Core m5-6Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P7450

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y54 is positioned at rank 1132 and the Core 2 Duo P7450 is on rank 15, so the Core 2 Duo P7450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54

#1120
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3596%
#1121
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3543%
#1122
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3252%
#1123
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3238%
#1124
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3208%
#1126
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3098%
#1127
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2971%
#1128
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2966%
#1129
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2886%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
95%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
94%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
94%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
93%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7450

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
127%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
125%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
115%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
115%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
114%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
110%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
105%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
105%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
102%
#15
Core 2 Duo P7450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
94%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
93%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
92%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
83%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
79%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
79%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
76%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
75%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
74%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core m5-6Y54 (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore m5-6Y54Core 2 Duo P7450
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo P7450 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore m5-6Y54Core 2 Duo P7450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y54 and Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7450

The Core 2 Duo P7450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,306 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo P7450's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7450 — a 23.6% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7450 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the Core 2 Duo P7450's 2,306 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7450. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 875 vs 250, a 111.1% lead for the Core m5-6Y54 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,648 vs 450 (114.2% advantage for the Core m5-6Y54). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7450.

FeatureCore m5-6Y54Core 2 Duo P7450
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+27%
2.13 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.13 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
3 MB+1100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,294
2,306
Geekbench 6 Single
875+250%
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,648+266%
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7450 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Core m5-6Y54 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m5-6Y54) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo P7450) — the Core 2 Duo P7450 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54) and PM45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo P7450).

FeatureCore m5-6Y54Core 2 Duo P7450
Socket
FCBGA1515
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) vs Disabled (Core 2 Duo P7450). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Core 2 Duo P7450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast, Core 2 Duo P7450 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.

FeatureCore m5-6Y54Core 2 Duo P7450
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 515
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Disabled
Target Use
Enthusiast
Laptop