Core m5-6Y54 vs Core 2 Duo T7500

CPU

GPU

Core m5-6Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015

Core 2 Duo T7500

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core m5-6Y54

2 / 4

2,294

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2,308

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y54 is positioned at rank 1132 and the Core 2 Duo T7500 is on rank 88, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54

#1120

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3596%

#1121

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3543%

#1122

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3252%

#1123

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3238%

#1124

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3208%

#1126

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3098%

#1127

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2971%

#1128

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2966%

#1129

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2886%

#1132

Core m5-6Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1134

Core i3-2330E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $10

99%

#1135

Core i5-4288U

MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A

95%

#1136

Core m3-6Y30

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1137

Core i3-2340UE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

95%

#1138

Core i7-2820QM

MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A

94%

#1139

Core i5-520M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

94%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

94%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

94%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

93%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

93%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

93%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500

#27

Core Ultra 7 265HX

MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A

94%

#76

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

254%

#77

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

251%

#78

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

230%

#79

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

229%

#80

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

227%

#82

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

219%

#83

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

210%

#84

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

210%

#85

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

204%

#88

Core 2 Duo T7500

MSRP: $316|Avg: $5

100%

#98

N150

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128

94%

#102

N100

MSRP: $128|Avg: $128

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core m5-6Y54 (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core m5-6Y54	Core 2 Duo T7500
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($281)	✅ More affordable ($5)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7500 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core m5-6Y54	Core 2 Duo T7500
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+5554%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($281)	✅ More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core m5-6Y54 Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo T7500 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y54 and Core 2 Duo T7500

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

Core 2 Duo T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2,308 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7500. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,648 vs 507 (105.9% advantage for the Core m5-6Y54). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500.

Feature	Core m5-6Y54	Core 2 Duo T7500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+23%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,294	2,308
Geekbench 6 Single	875	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,648+225%	507

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 on the Core m5-6Y54 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — the Core m5-6Y54 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500).

Feature	Core m5-6Y54	Core 2 Duo T7500
Socket	FCBGA1515	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1866+50%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast, Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y; Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

Feature	Core m5-6Y54	Core 2 Duo T7500
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 515	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x
Target Use	Enthusiast	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Core m5-6Y54 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 debuted at $316. At current prices ($281 vs $5), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $276 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y54 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 461.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7500 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 193% better value option.