Core m5-6Y54 vs Athlon X4 730
Core m5-6Y54
Athlon X4 730
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y54 is positioned at rank 1132 and the Athlon X4 730 is on rank 519, so the Athlon X4 730 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 730
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($52) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+437%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($52) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y54 and Athlon X4 730
Core m5-6Y54
The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.
Athlon X4 730
The Athlon X4 730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 730 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 730 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 730 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 730 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 730 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the Athlon X4 730's 2,278 — a 0.7% lead for the Core m5-6Y54.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz+155% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,294 | 2,278 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 875 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,648 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 730 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon X4 730 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m5-6Y54) vs 16 (Athlon X4 730) — the Athlon X4 730 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 730).
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 16+60% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) / not specified (Athlon X4 730). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Athlon X4 730 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 515 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Value Analysis
The Core m5-6Y54 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 730 debuted at $60. At current prices ($281 vs $52), the Athlon X4 730 is $229 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y54 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 43.8 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 730 — making the Athlon X4 730 the 137.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y54 | Athlon X4 730 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $60-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $52-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 43.8+434% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m5-6Y54 and Athlon X4 730
