Core m5-6Y54 vs E2-7110

Core m5-6Y54 vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Core m5-6Y54

2 / 4

2,294

+0.5%

Pentium Dual Core T4400

2,282

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m5-6Y54 vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m5-6Y54 vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m5-6Y54

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 15W, a 11W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 515, while E2-7110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E2-7110 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,282 vs 2,294).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 4.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core m5-6Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m5-6Y54 better than E2-7110?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-7110 is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y54 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y54 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m5-6Y54 is the better buy right now. Core m5-6Y54 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that E2-7110 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core m5-6Y54 vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y54 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the E2-7110 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-7110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54. The Core m5-6Y54 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y54 scores 2,294 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m5-6Y54.

Feature	Core m5-6Y54	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+50%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,294	2,282
Geekbench 6 Single	875	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,648	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-7110 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m5-6Y54	E2-7110
Socket	FCBGA1515	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54) / not specified (E2-7110). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the E2-7110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.