Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron 3400+

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron 3400+ Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1400

1 / 1

428

0.0%

433

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron 3400+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron 3400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 62W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (428 vs 433).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Sempron 3400+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 3400+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌3000% higher power demand at 62W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3400+ better than Core Solo T1400?

Yes. Sempron 3400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3400+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron 3400+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Solo T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron 3400+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1400

The Core Solo T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron 3400+

The Sempron 3400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 433 points. Launch price was $30.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1400 and Sempron 3400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core Solo T1400 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3400+ — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Sempron 3400+. The Core Solo T1400 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3400+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1400 scores 428 against the Sempron 3400+'s 433 — a 1.2% lead for the Sempron 3400+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1400	Sempron 3400+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+1500%	128 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	428	433+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3400+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.