Core Solo T1400 vs Turion 64 MT-28

Core Solo T1400 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1400

1 / 1

428

0.0%

445

+4.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1400 vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1400 vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (428 vs 445).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 MT-28

2005

Why buy it

✅+4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1400 better than Turion 64 MT-28?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Solo T1400 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 pulls ahead with 4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 MT-28 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1400 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion 64 MT-28 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Solo T1400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core Solo T1400 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1400

The Core Solo T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1400 and Turion 64 MT-28 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core Solo T1400 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1400. The Core Solo T1400 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1400 scores 428 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 — a 3.9% lead for the Turion 64 MT-28. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1400	Turion 64 MT-28
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz+14%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	428	445+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.