Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron LE-1300

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron LE-1300 Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1400

1 / 1

428

0.0%

438

+2.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron LE-1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron LE-1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (428 vs 438).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron LE-1300

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1300 better than Core Solo T1400?

Yes. Sempron LE-1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron LE-1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron LE-1300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Sempron LE-1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Solo T1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1400 vs Sempron LE-1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1400

The Core Solo T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron LE-1300

The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1400 and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Core Solo T1400 versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1300. The Core Solo T1400 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1400 scores 428 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 2.3% lead for the Sempron LE-1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1400	Sempron LE-1300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2.3 GHz+26%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	428	438+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.