
Core Ultra 5 225U

Xeon Gold 6244
Core Ultra 5 225U vs Xeon Gold 6244 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 225U vs Xeon Gold 6244 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 225U vs Xeon Gold 6244: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 225U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 150W, a 136W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores), while Xeon Gold 6244 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6244 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6244, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6244
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌971.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 14W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6244 better than Core Ultra 5 225U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225U vs Xeon Gold 6244 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225U
The Core Ultra 5 225U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6244
The Xeon Gold 6244 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 18,609 points. Launch price was $2,925.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6244 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225U scores 18,434 against the Xeon Gold 6244's 18,609 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6244. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225U vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6244.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon Gold 6244 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+9% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 24.75 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | — | 8 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,434 | 18,609 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,846 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6244 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400 on the Core Ultra 5 225U versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6244 — the Core Ultra 5 225U supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6244 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225U) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6244). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 225U) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6244) — the Xeon Gold 6244 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 5 225U) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6244).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon Gold 6244 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 / LPDDR5x-8400+118% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6244 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core Ultra 5 225U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6244). The Core Ultra 5 225U includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6244 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225U rivals Ryzen 5 8640U; Xeon Gold 6244 rivals EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225U | Xeon Gold 6244 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe Cores) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













