Core Ultra 5 235T vs Core Ultra 5 245T

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235T

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 245T

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······

Core Ultra 5 235T vs Core Ultra 5 245T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 235T vs Core Ultra 5 245T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 235T vs Core Ultra 5 245T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 235T

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $23 less on MSRP ($247 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
  • Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.8 vs 120.2 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (32,053 vs 32,444).

Core Ultra 5 245T

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 120.2 vs 129.8 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Ultra 5 245T better than Core Ultra 5 235T?
    Yes. Core Ultra 5 245T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Ultra 5 245T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 235T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 5 245T comes in 9.3% more expensive on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $247 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 235T is also 8.0% better value on MSRP (129.8 vs 120.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Ultra 5 245T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 14/14. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core Ultra 5 235T vs Core Ultra 5 245T Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 235T

    The Core Ultra 5 235T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,053 points. Launch price was $247.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 245T

    The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core Ultra 5 235T and Core Ultra 5 245T share an identical 14-core/14-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235T versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). Both are built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235T scores 32,053 against the Core Ultra 5 245T's 32,444 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245T. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235TCore Ultra 5 245T
    Cores / Threads
    14 / 14
    14 / 14
    Boost Clock
    5 GHz
    5.1 GHz+2%
    Base Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    24 MB (total)
    24 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    3 MB (per core)
    3 MB (per core)
    Process
    3 nm
    3 nm
    Architecture
    Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
    Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
    PassMark
    32,053
    32,444+1%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,760
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    12,900
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA1851 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 235T) vs 20 (Core Ultra 5 245T) — the Core Ultra 5 235T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235TCore Ultra 5 245T
    Socket
    LGA1851
    LGA1851
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6400
    DDR5-6400
    Max RAM Capacity
    192 GB
    256 GB+33%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    24+20%
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU (Core Ultra 5 235T) and Arc Xe-LPG 64EU (Core Ultra 5 245T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235T targets Mainstream Desktop, Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235TCore Ultra 5 245T
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU
    Arc Xe-LPG 64EU
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Mainstream Desktop
    Desktop Low Power
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core Ultra 5 235T was priced at $247, while the Core Ultra 5 245T came in at $270. On launch pricing ($247 vs $270), Core Ultra 5 235T was $23 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 235T delivers 129.8 pts/$ vs 120.2 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245T — making the Core Ultra 5 235T the 7.7% better value option.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235TCore Ultra 5 245T
    MSRP
    $247-9%
    $270
    Performance per Dollar
    129.8+8%
    120.2
    Release Date
    2025
    2025

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.