Core Ultra 5 235T
Ryzen 7 8700G
Core Ultra 5 235T vs Ryzen 7 8700G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 235T vs Ryzen 7 8700G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 235T vs Ryzen 7 8700G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 235T
2025Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($247 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.8 vs 96.2 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,900 vs 14,326).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 8700G.
Ryzen 7 8700G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Spire), unlike Core Ultra 5 235T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 96.2 vs 129.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700G better than Core Ultra 5 235T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235T vs Ryzen 7 8700G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 5 235T
The Core Ultra 5 235T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,053 points. Launch price was $247.
Ryzen 7 8700G
The Ryzen 7 8700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,649 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700G — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700G uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235T scores 32,053 against the Ryzen 7 8700G's 31,649 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,760 vs 2,720, a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,900 vs 14,326 (10.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235T | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 32,053+1% | 31,649 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,760+1% | 2,720 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,900 | 14,326+11% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235T versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700G — the Core Ultra 5 235T supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 8700G supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 235T) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8700G) — the Core Ultra 5 235T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235T) and X670,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700G).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235T | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 8700G has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8700G supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 235T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700G). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU (Core Ultra 5 235T) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8700G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235T targets Mainstream Desktop, Ryzen 7 8700G targets High-end Desktop APU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700G rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235T | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | High-end Desktop APU |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 235T was priced at $247, while the Ryzen 7 8700G came in at $329. On launch pricing ($247 vs $329), Core Ultra 5 235T was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 235T delivers 129.8 pts/$ vs 96.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700G — making the Core Ultra 5 235T the 29.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235T | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $247-25% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 129.8+35% | 96.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 235T and Ryzen 7 8700G
