
Core Ultra 7 165H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 39,966).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $479 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core Ultra 7 165H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,849 vs 39,966).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $479 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 165H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 9800X3D better than Core Ultra 7 165H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 165H and Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
The Core Ultra 7 165H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,849 points. Launch price was $460.


Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 165H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 165H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 165H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 165H scores 25,849 against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 39,966 — a 42.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 165H vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.2 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,849 | 39,966+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 23,277 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 165H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 7 165H) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core Ultra 7 165H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 165H | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












