
Core Ultra 7 268V

Ryzen 7 5800HS
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 5800HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 5800HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 5800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Ryzen 7 5800HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 5800HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,512 vs 19,698).
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 268V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Ryzen 7 5800HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen 7 5800HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 268V
The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800HS
The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 19,512 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 19,698 | 19,512 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,653 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,437 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Ryzen 7 5800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 140V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












