Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 7545U

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

8 Cores8 Thrd30 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7545U

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 9 288V

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $600 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7545U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 5 7545U

2023

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 28W instead of 30W, a 2W reduction.
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (20,185 vs 20,280).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Ryzen 5 7545U?
Yes. Core Ultra 9 288V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 288V is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 288V is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 9 288V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 9 288V is at an unclear MSRP at $600 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (33.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 288V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
1080p
low278 FPS265 FPS
medium246 FPS237 FPS
high207 FPS198 FPS
ultra178 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS232 FPS
medium187 FPS187 FPS
high153 FPS152 FPS
ultra135 FPS134 FPS
4K
low163 FPS163 FPS
medium132 FPS133 FPS
high102 FPS102 FPS
ultra89 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
1080p
low481 FPS434 FPS
medium383 FPS341 FPS
high337 FPS293 FPS
ultra298 FPS250 FPS
1440p
low426 FPS362 FPS
medium352 FPS297 FPS
high312 FPS262 FPS
ultra267 FPS219 FPS
4K
low311 FPS272 FPS
medium269 FPS227 FPS
high251 FPS206 FPS
ultra218 FPS171 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
1080p
low507 FPS505 FPS
medium507 FPS505 FPS
high507 FPS505 FPS
ultra507 FPS505 FPS
1440p
low507 FPS505 FPS
medium507 FPS505 FPS
high507 FPS505 FPS
ultra477 FPS445 FPS
4K
low507 FPS503 FPS
medium473 FPS438 FPS
high419 FPS374 FPS
ultra349 FPS309 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
1080p
low507 FPS505 FPS
medium507 FPS505 FPS
high507 FPS505 FPS
ultra507 FPS505 FPS
1440p
low507 FPS505 FPS
medium507 FPS505 FPS
high507 FPS505 FPS
ultra507 FPS505 FPS
4K
low507 FPS505 FPS
medium507 FPS489 FPS
high496 FPS434 FPS
ultra433 FPS370 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 288V and Ryzen 5 7545U

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7545U

The Ryzen 5 7545U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,185 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7545U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 9 288V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7545U — a 4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7545U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Ryzen 5 7545U's 20,185 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7545U.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+4%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark
20,280
20,185
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,300
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7545U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5X-8533 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7545U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 7545U) — the Ryzen 5 7545U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
20+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 7545U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7545U). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc 140V (Core Ultra 9 288V) and Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 7545U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7545U targets Mobile.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen 5 7545U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140V
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile