Core Ultra 9 288V
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,300 vs 12,814).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+37.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $291 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.5 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 9 288V.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 288V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 288V
The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,300 vs 12,814 (31.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,627, a 53% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 7,556 (27.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+16% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 20,280 | 20,227 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,300 | 12,814+38% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+72% | 1,627 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000+32% | 7,556 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — the Core Ultra 9 288V supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 288V) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533+167% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140V (Core Ultra 9 288V) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140V | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 288V was priced at $600, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G came in at $309. On launch pricing ($600 vs $309), Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G was $291 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 288V delivers 33.8 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G the 63.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $309-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 65.5+94% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 288V and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
