Core Ultra 9 288V
VS
Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Core Ultra 9 288V vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

8 Cores8 Thrd30 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 288V

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
119%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
116%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
114%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
114%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
110%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
108%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 288V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen Embedded V3C48
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen Embedded V3C48
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 288V and Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 288V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 288V scores 20,280 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen Embedded V3C48
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+34%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-50%
6 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark
20,280
20,203
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,300
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 288V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen Embedded V3C48
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core Ultra 9 288V) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 288VRyzen Embedded V3C48
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true