E-240
VS
Ryzen 5 3600

E-240 vs Ryzen 5 3600

AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The E-240 is positioned at rank #1169 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1410%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1332%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
291%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
116%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
114%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
103%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
99%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
98%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
95%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
93%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
92%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
91%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
91%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
88%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
85%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
85%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
85%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
83%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
83%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 3600 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE-240Ryzen 5 3600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The E-240 (2011) relies on 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE-240Ryzen 5 3600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Ryzen 5 3600

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 94.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 192.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-240 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
6 / 12+500%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+180%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-83%
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
338
17,685+5132%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
FT1
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-240) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation