E1-1200 vs Pentium P6300

E1-1200 vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

E1-1200

2 / 2

1,682

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

+0.2%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E1-1200 vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E1-1200 vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E1-1200

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,682 vs 1,685).

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while E1-1200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-1200 better than Pentium P6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E1-1200 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium P6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-1200 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E1-1200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E1-1200 vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E1-1200

The E1-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,682 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-1200 and Pentium P6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the E1-1200 versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 135.3% clock advantage for the E1-1200. The E1-1200 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E1-1200 scores 1,682 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium P6300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-1200 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6300.

Feature	E1-1200	Pentium P6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+419%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.27 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	40 nm	32 nm-20%
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,682	1,685

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-1200 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.