
T1200 Mobile

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
T1200 Mobile vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
T1200 Mobile vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
T1200 Mobile vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅+18483.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (42 vs 7,805).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T1200 Mobile vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
T1200 Mobile
The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the T1200 Mobile scores 7,805 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the T1200 Mobile leads by 18483.3%. The T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T1200 Mobile) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,805+18483% | 42 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 4096+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 2920 MHz+105% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The T1200 Mobile has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 carries 512 MB. T1200 Mobile gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the T1200 Mobile and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (T1200 Mobile) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1+34% | 9.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+130% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VideoShader |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The T1200 Mobile draws 95W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 103.8% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-68% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 175mm |
| Height | 0mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 82.2+82100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | T1200 Mobile | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | — | Navi 48 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #325 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















