T1200 Mobile vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T1200 Mobile is positioned at rank #10 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T1200 Mobile

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

111%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

101%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

101%

#10

T1200 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

91%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

91%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T1200 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18483.3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.

Insight	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+18483.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-18483.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the T1200 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

T1200 Mobile Benchmark Check

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T1200 Mobile and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

T1200 Mobile

The T1200 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,805 points.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the T1200 Mobile scores 7,805 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the T1200 Mobile leads by 18483.3%. The T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T1200 Mobile) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2920 MHz.

Feature	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score	7,805+18483%	42
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1024	4096+300%
Boost Clock	1425 MHz	2920 MHz+105%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T1200 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has 512 MB. The T1200 Mobile offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (T1200 Mobile) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
DirectX	12.1+34%	9.0
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+130%	2.0
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (T1200 Mobile) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VideoShader. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1200 Mobile) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	T1200 Mobile	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	VideoShader
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T1200 Mobile draws 95W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 103.8% difference. The T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.